Lw and MW interaction
#27220

Mystfade the Dark Tarotto Everyone

All,


I do not believe there is a single senior on any side who does not realise the importance of new blood to the realm.

That being said, the method described by Hyperion where a senior should just disengage when a youngster willingly attacks does no good for the long term potential of the new player either.


I always tell young thakrians, if they willingly turn FIGHTING ON, attack a senior either in my city or in the others, they must be prepared to face consequences. It is fundamentally wrong when any young player can get 60 bonds on a player by bonding once by hiding in the pool or by forcing the senior to disengage.


What I have seen in the past and what should change is that once the lw/mw has died, there should not be any further herassment, further killing or stripping. I have seen this basically from all 3 cities and we as seniors/leaders should just agree to stop that part.


I personally think there should not be any more commands than FIGHTING ON or FIGHTING OFF meaning that when it is ON the youngster considers himself ready to fight anyone and when it is off , they only fight their peers via challenge or jumping.


Long story short, any LW/MW that willfully turns FIGHTING ON, buys poisons, sets up defences and actively partakes in combat against a Thakrian senior will die. I expect the other cities to treat Thakrian youngsters the same way. They will be prepared and made aware of the consequences by our seniors.


Mystfade, The Dark Tarot.


Written and shown unedited exactly as rendered by text based game bulletin board on Avalon Online RPG and by my hand on the 9th of Mournsend, in the year 1449.